Findings from The Guardian in JO304


Prior to this semester, I almost never read The Guardian. I would look to other publications and news sites for my daily news; however, after spending this semester tracking and analyzing the content presented by The Guardian, whether through written pieces, tweets or pictures and videos, it is clear that the company has persistently worked to include various progressive perspectives while catering to the concerns of the public. These are the biggest highlights and lowlights I’ve observed so far.

1. Broad Range of Platforms

The Guardian does a great job of utilizing different platforms to spread news. Whether it’s through pictures, videos, podcasts, Facebook or Twitter, each of these platforms is constantly updated with the most recent news. For instance, The Guardian released an in-depth podcast on EU citizens in relation to the Windrush generation and the Brexit vote. One particular strength of The Guardian’s podcasts is that they include a brief written piece that thoroughly summarizes the gist of the podcast. Additionally, if you find yourself without enough time to access the latest news online, both The Guardian’s constant Twitter updates and its mobile app make it easier to get the latest news.

Screen Shot 2018-04-26 at 11.40.57 AM


2.  Explainers

The Guardian has a strong explainer section, especially in the video category. All topics in the explainer section are a surprisingly balanced collection of both hard and soft news issues. In addition, The Guardian’s video explainer section ultimately makes it easier to fully comprehend what’s really happening behind both nationally and internationally controversial issues. A more recent example of this is the visual explainer The Guardian used to describe those who make up the British Windrush generation.

Screen Shot 2018-04-26 at 11.39.07 AM

3. Text and Visuals

The Guardian could improve the number of visuals they incorporate into their stories. Most written pieces only include one photo under the article’s header, while it would be more helpful and easier for the reader to process the written material if it were evenly complemented by additional relevant images. Not all of their articles are structured this way. Some include more visuals than others, but overall, I think readership would increase if blocks of text and images were properly combined.

4. Audience Assumptions

The primary audience of The Guardian typically involves educated individuals aged between 21-34-years-old. I feel that many of The Guardian’s articles automatically assume that the reader has certain knowledge of an ongoing political crisis, without first summarizing what the issue is and what it means. This is why “explainer” sections are extremely helpful when it comes to news sites. Though The Guardian has an “explainer” section under it’s video section, the explainer section doesn’t cover all of the controversial topics presented on the site’s home page. This isn’t to say The Guardian needs an explainer section for its written pieces, those same pieces can simply be made more comprehensible if The Guardian actively aims to do a stronger job of describing and summarizing the issue before delving into how it affected a particular official or aspect of a greater issue.

5. Moving forward

Ultimately, The Guardian has done an excellent job of honoring its mission–consistently organizing society for the common good, while working to open themselves to the concerns of the public. While it offers a variety of topics, including news, opinion, sport, culture and lifestyle, the publication also effectively covers news across several different platforms. The content presented in The Guardian, whether soft or hard news, is typically easy to digest; however, The Guardian could do a better job of including more helpful visuals to go along with their written pieces. Overall, The Guardian’s effort at giving a voice to the voiceless is clear.

Screen Shot 2018-04-26 at 12.04.27 PM


The Guardian Uses Captivating Visuals to Explain the Impact of China’s One-Child Policy

After the Chinese government decided to remove its one-child policy in 2015, the Guardian responded by implementing a different approach in describing the effects of the one-child policy–they included minimal text but copious visuals.

Originally published in 2015, the article included graphs and charts highlighting China’s decline of population growth, the decrease in the working age population, the increasing age dependency ratio and the gender imbalance that resulted from the 1980 one-child policy.

The data in the article was obtained from the United Nations and the World Bank.

Screen Shot 2018-04-19 at 10.58.52 AM

Screen Shot 2018-04-19 at 11.00.15 AM

Screen Shot 2018-04-19 at 11.02.03 AM

Screen Shot 2018-04-19 at 11.03.07 AM

Overall, this article’s combination of both concise and informative summaries and its use of data visualization ultimately made it highly effective. I was able to simultaneously read the details and see them for myself. Additionally, all of the graphs and charts were accompanied by short, written descriptions that were easily digestible. Although there weren’t many colors other than blue and white, the visuals were nevertheless more interesting than extensive blocks and blocks of text.

Beyond Boston Strong Live Tweeting Event


Renowned journalists convened for a panel discussion amongst a relatively small audience Tuesday, April 10 at Suffolk University to discuss their experiences with the marathon that day and the journalistic work that spanned from the 2013 bombings.

The panelists included award-winning Boston Globe reporter David Abel, VICE writer Dave Wedge, independent journalist Susan Zalkind and photojournalist and Suffolk University professor Ken Martin. The event was hosted by The New England Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists and the discussion moderated by Jordan Frias, the president of the New England chapter.

The panel was especially intriguing in that it presented many different perspectives, experiences and lessons that the journalists had endured both leading up to, during and after the bombings.

Dave Abel said he covered the impact of the bombing for up to a year after it took place. He included that his main focus after the bombing was to focus more on the stories of the individuals who survived and less on the person behind the bombing.

Susan Zalkind said, when covering tragic events, it’s important to be in touch with the grief others are experiencing, while maintaining your duty as a professional reporter.

Later during the discussion while the panelists shared advice about reporting and journalism, Dave Wedge said that journalism is about much more than simply getting the story.

“It’s about human connection at the end of the day, and respect,” Wedge said.

Overall, the event was amazing in that it combined both separate and similar experiences from different journalists and writers into one powerful mission–to reflect upon and learn from the Boston Marathon bombings.